19-20).Īgain, we have to ask ourselves what the facts are, and what is pure speculation. The “history” portrayed here is of Homo Sapiens either outbreeding or massacring the other Homo species, driving them into oblivion (pp. 8), but other human species, like Homo neanderthalensis (Neanderthals), are effectively “an animal from a different species” (p. All others of the genus Homo are still technically “human beings” (p. As defined by Harari, humans are to be defined practically as those of the species Homo Sapiens. Harari’s speculation concerning the past becomes even more problematic when he moves onto the supposed cousin species of humanity. The case of the Neanderthals: Preliminary concerns General critiques: The idolatry of the futurist Conclusion General critiques: On the telling of the history of humankind and not humans On the challenges of the future Specific critiques: Re-engaging the sciences Specific critiques: The problem of induction Christianity and the Nature of Religion Specific critiques: The case of the Neanderthals: Preliminary concerns Harari's interpretation of Jewish and Christian Scripture Specific critiques: History of primeval human development: preliminary concerns Part 4, The case of the Neanderthals: Preliminary concerns Harari's interpretation of Jewish and Christian Scripture and of Christian theologyīook: Yuval Noah Harari, Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind (London, UK: Penguin Random House, 2011) Outline: ![]() ![]() Review of “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |