![]() We don’t often see half dollars anymore, but they once were a major part of everyday commerce. But many people think they’ve found a silver penny! Here’s why: Well, not really… At least not in the United States. “Wait, there were silver pennies?” you might be asking. Overall demand - whether enough people collect this coin to drive up its numismatic (collectible) value Silver Pennies (1943 and Other Years).Errors and/or varieties - whether there’s anything unusual about the coin.Grade and overall state of preservation - the condition of the coin.Number of survivors - how many of that coin still exist. ![]() Mintage number - how many of that coin were made.Precious metal content - how much silver a coin contains.When it comes to determining the value of your silver coins, keep in mind, silver coin values are based on the following factors: The dates that the metal composition changed for each U.S.A list of the most valuable silver coins by denomination.So many people have been asking me about the value of their silver pennies, nickels, dimes, quarters, half dollars, and dollars! coins and want to know how much they’re worth? If you buy thru these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you.ĭo you have some silver U.S. Mint and Bureau of Engraving and Printing as well as 10 selected stakeholders representing industries that could potentially be affected by currency changes.This post may contain affiliate links. Mint, and interviewed officials from the Federal Reserve, U.S. GAO conducted economic simulations of continued use of $1 notes and replacing notes with $1 coins, examined cost data from the U.S. This report (1) estimates the net benefit to the government, if any, of replacing the $1 note with a $1 coin and selected stakeholders' views on this change and (2) examines what is known about potential cost savings from suspending penny production and changing the metal composition of the nickel, and selected stakeholders' views on these changes. GAO was asked to examine the potential cost savings to the government from making changes to currency. Since 1990, GAO had estimated replacing the $1 note with a $1 coin would provide a benefit to the federal government. Other countries have replaced notes with coins of the same value to reduce costs. ![]() Since 2006, both the penny and nickel have cost more to make than their face value. spent about $1.3 billion in 2017 to produce, process, and circulate coins and paper notes for use in the economy. Without such authority, the Mint might not be producing coins as cost-effectively as possible. Since Congress specifies in law which coins are made and their metal composition, the Mint has proposed legislation to enable the Secretary of the Treasury to change the metal content of coins as long as the weight or machine acceptance of the coins is unaffected. Stakeholders were unconcerned about changes to the nickel as long as the changes would not affect how the coin functioned, for example, in vending machines. However, Federal Reserve officials and some stakeholders expressed concern about temporarily suspending the penny due to the potential for external effects, such as penny shortages. ![]() It also estimates that it could save about $74 million over 10 years by changing the metal composition of the dime and quarter. Mint estimates that it could save approximately $250 million over 10 years by suspending penny production and between $2 million and $9 million per year by changing the metal composition of the nickel. For example, armored carriers told GAO that their transportation costs would increase because coins weigh more than notes.Įstimated Cumulative Present-Value Net Loss to the Government from Actively and Gradually Replacing $1 Notes with $1 Coins over 30 Years Seven of 10 stakeholders GAO met with said that replacing the $1 note with a $1 coin would result in additional costs. Stakeholders generally identified few benefits from replacing $1 notes with $1 coins. For example, the lifespan of the $1 note has more than doubled since a 2011 GAO analysis, from 3.3 years to 7.9 years, largely due to changes in note processing technology. GAO's estimates are based on current data and economic projections, which have changed over time. These simulations represent the first time GAO has found that replacing the $1 note with a $1 coin would result in a net loss to the government rather than a net benefit. GAO found the government would incur a loss of about $611 million if notes were actively replaced and about $2.6 billion if $1 notes were replaced gradually (see figure). GAO's analysis found that replacing the $1 note with a $1 coin would likely result in a net loss to the government over 30 years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |